Does A 5-At-The-Back Even Exist?

To those of us who play FIFA, the reaction on coming up against a formation that fields 3 defenders, to the one that fields 5 is diametrically opposite. The position of left and right sided midfielders are taken up by fullbacks in a 5ATB being the difference.

However, in the real world, is there effectively any formation involving 5 defenders? To put it in a different way, is there any difference between a 3ATB and a 5ATB?

Whenever 3 centre backs are started, the formation that is depicted on the lineup sheet is a 3-4-3, or a 3-5-2, and this is irrespective of whether the men on the flanks are naturally midfielders or defenders. Moreover, it is seen that managers tend to use attack minded players in a withdrawn position to play the role of ‘wing backs’ so as to facilitate starting 3 centre halves.

In the few games that I’ve seen that involve this formation, the wingers are generally attackers who are tasked with making marauding runs forward and supplementing the attack more than contributing to the defensive aspect of the team. Even when traditional full backs are started as part of a 3/5 man defence, they generally play their game in the opposition half, while occasionally helping out tracking their counterparts playing on the wings.

It may initially appear that starting a 3 CB back line is a defensive move, but in reality, it is quite the opposite. Effectively, regardless of their nature or role, the wing backs are used for taking the game to the opposition, rather than preventing the opposition from doing the same.

So coming back to the question in the title, does a 5 at the back even exist in the modern day game? Based what I’ve seen during my time watching football, 5 man back lines are obsolete, and the phrase “5 at the back” is something that exists only in the virtual world, not in the real one.



7 thoughts on “Does A 5-At-The-Back Even Exist?”

  1. A 3-4-3 in transition can have 5 at the back with the 2 midfielders dropping back. Cruyff was such a genius that he could see through the smallest nuances. Most would consider 3-4-3 weak in the defensive aspects but, it’s actually very strong, considering 2 midfielders can drop back during defensive transition.
    Great read, overall.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Absolutely right you are. I believe that Kanté Matic duo was quite key to Contés Chelsea when they went on that 6 game spree without conceding. Defensive midfield is one of the most crucial positions IMO, and as you said, can be used to great effect.
      And thank you! 😀


    2. Will be considered a downright failure if they fail to win the PL, considering the number of players they’ll (hopefully) have brought in over the summer. But this season should really reflect the Guardiola era in full bloom

      Liked by 1 person

      1. A goalkeeper who’s excellent with his feet, ball playing defenders, midfielders capable of playing mic-toc, KDB probably in the free Messi role. Pep has it all planned. Don’t think anyone apart from City will life the EPL.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s